“Politics” has traditionally been a hot-button issue with
American citizens. It’s a topic that can generate strong, emotional
opinions,
often leading to discussion, controversy, and potentially intense
disagreements. During his
lifetime, Edgar Rice Burroughs was
never shy about sharing his political views. For those
who wonder about
Burroughs’ personal political beliefs, I suggest consulting the Porges
biography, where plenty of information can be found about the author’s
beliefs
on many issues. The purpose here, though, is to provide a survey of
statements relating
to politics and government that can be found in his fiction.
Considering
the large volume of fiction Burroughs produced during his career, he
seldom
touched upon the elements of politics and government. He was foremost a
chronicler of adventure and romance. Still, “occasionally,” as he noted
above,
political affairs did crop up in his narratives.
A Perfect
Government
“We have
just laws and only a few
of them. Our people are happy because they are always working at
something
which they enjoy. There is no money, nor is any money value placed upon
any
commodity. Perry and I were as one in resolving that the root of all
evil
should not be introduced into Pellucidar while we lived.
“A man may
exchange that which he
produces for something which he desires that another has produced; but
he
cannot dispose of the thing he thus acquired. In other words, a
commodity
ceases to have pecuniary value the instant that it passes out of the
hands of
its producer. All excess reverts to government; and, as this represents
the
production of the people, the government may dispose of it to other
peoples in
exchange for that which they produce. Thus we are establishing a trade
between
kingdoms, the profits from which go to the betterment of the people—to
building
factories for the manufacture of agricultural implements, and machinery
for the
various trades we are gradually teaching the people.”
While that
sounds like a good description of the 20th
century’s autocratic-controlled communist economic system, we have to
allow
that Burroughs wrote Pellucidar in
late 1914 and early 1915, before the first such government and economic
system
came to power in Russia. In 1919, after ERB had an opportunity to see
communism
in action, he wrote Under the Red Flag
(latter revised as part 2 of The Moon
Maid) exposing the
evils of the communist system.
“I have no
quarrel with peace or
virtue or temperance. My quarrel is with the misguided theorists who
think that
peace alone, or virtue alone, or temperance alone will make a strong,
virile, and
contented nation. They must be mixed with war and wine and sin and a
great
measure of hard work—especially hard work—and with nothing but peace
and
prosperity there is little necessity for hard work, and only the
exceptional
man works hard when he does not have to.”
Political Parties
Burroughs
almost completely avoided mentioning American political parties in his
fiction.
Only two stories, both of them written very late in his career, contain
specific references to the Republican and Democratic parties. The first
is in Savage Pellucidar,
ERB’s final inner
world book. The ship of Ah-gilak, an elderly American man, had been
swept down
into Pellucidar through the polar opening decades ago. He lamented that
if he
had had a better ship, “I wouldn’t be
down here now in this dod-burned
hole-in-the-ground,
but back in Cape Cod, probably votin’ for John Tyler again, or some
other good
Democrat.”
Then,
in Tarzan and “The Foreign Legion”,
the band of men fighting for survival on the island of Sumatra during
World War
II included at least one supporter of each major American political
party.
Captain Jerry Lucas was the Democrat. He became a misogynist after his
girl
dumped him when he went off to war. “I could have forgiven her throwing
me over
for a 4-F as soon as I was out of sight,” he told he fellow aviators,
“but the
so-and-so was a Republican into the bargain.” Sergeant Joe Bubonovitch,
waist
gunner in the downed American bomber, explained that a man’s political
party
was of little importance during wartime. “Just to keep the record
straight,” he
said, “I am a good anti-New Deal
Republican.”
Abner
Dinnwiddie, another Burroughs character, was obviously a Republican,
although
the author didn’t mention the party name in his short story, The Strange Adventure of Mr. Dinnwiddie.
On
boarding the liner Lusonia bound for
Honolulu, Mr. Dinnwiddie was mistaken for another man on the passenger
list,
“Admiral Arnold Dinnwoodie, USN.” The dimwitted Mr. Dinnwiddie decided
not to
correct the mistake.
“He was a
little put out that they
had spelled his name incorrectly. He thought that the ‘admiral’ was
just a
nautical compliment, but he couldn’t quite make out the USN. He thought
it a
little New Dealish; and as he had voted for Alf Landon in 1936, he was
inclined
to take umbrage; but he finally decided that it was either an error or
all in
fun; so he determined to pass it over.”
(In
the 1936 presidential election, the incumbent President Franklin
Roosevelt, a
Democrat, defeated Alf Landon, the Republican candidate, in a
landslide.)
Politicians
On
a few occasions, Burroughs took a jab at politicians in general,
regardless of
party. In The Deputy Sheriff of Comanche
County, Dora Crowell told fellow dude ranch guest Bruce Marvel
that
she
didn’t believe he was a businessman like he claimed. “I’ve been reading
a lot
about politics in Pennsylvania,” he responded, “and I shouldn’t blame
you if
you didn’t trust nobody.”
Then,
in Tarzan and “The Foreign Legion”,
Burroughs likened a certain Sumatran native who collaborated with the
Japanese
to an American candidate running for election. “Amat tried to curry
favor with
the newcomers. He was a confirmed opportunist, a natural born
politician.”
In
The Wizard of Venus, Burroughs
again
gave politicians a dig. It came at the end of a conversation between
Carson
Napier and the wizard Morgas.
“No,” I
said, “but you are a
jackass.”
“You,” I
told him.
He smiled
appreciatively. “I
suppose a jackass is a great person in your country?” he said.
“Many of
them are in high places,”
I assured him.
Burroughs
provided a more sobering commentary concerning the ultimate fate of
powerful
politicians in Jungle Tales of Tarzan.
When Rabba-Kega, the powerful witch-doctor of Mbonga’s cannibal tribe,
disappeared, the author pondered his legacy.
Taxes
Burroughs
commented on the issue of government taxes several times in Tarzan
and the Ant Men. Gefasto and
Gofoloso, two princes in the city of Veltopismakus, debated which
economic
class in their society most felt the burden of government taxes. Like a
good
Republican would, Gofoloso defended the upper class. “The heaviest
taxation
falls upon the rich,” he declared. Like a good Democrat,
Gefasto spoke
for the
lower class. “In theory,” he responded to Gofoloso’s statement, “it is
true
that the rich pay the bulk of the taxes into the treasury of the king,
but
first they collect it from the poor in higher prices and other forms of
extortion, in proportion of two jetaks
for every one that they pay to the tax collector.”
Later
in the story, another prince, Komodoflorensal insisted that the
prosperous
class was unduly burdened by the government’s tax structure. “To be
poor,” he
explained, “assures one an easier life than being rich, for the poor
have no
tax to pay, while those who work hard and accumulate property have only
their
labor for their effort, since the government takes all from them in
taxes.”
As
for the government officials in Veltopismakus, Burroughs explained how
they
made sure the tax laws favored themselves. Zoanthrohago, another
prince, asked
King Elkomoelhago to make him a member of the royal council. “He had no
objection to Zoanthrohago being a royal councilor,” Burroughs
explained, “and
thus escaping the burdensome income-tax, which the makers of the tax
had been
careful to see proved no burden to themselves, and he knew that
probably was
the only reason Zoanthrohago wished to be a councilor.”
The Courts
Burroughs
seldom commented on the American court system in his fiction. However,
in The Girl From Farris’s, he had a
“retired capitalist” speak out against the grand jury system, as used
in
Chicago in the early years of the 20th century.
“In theory
the grand jury system is
the bulwark of our liberty—it was, in fact, when it was instituted in
the
twelfth or thirteenth century, at a time when there were several
hundred crimes
punishable by death; but now that there are only two, murder and
treason, it is
a useless and wasteful relic of a dead past.
“The court
that is competent to
hold men to the grand jury is much more competent to indict them than
is the
grand jury itself. In fact, in cases where the punishment is less than
death
the court that now entertains the preliminary hearing might, to much
better
advantage to both the accused and public, pass sentence at once. It
hears both
sides, but all that it can do is discharge the prisoner or hold him for
the
grand jury. After this there is the expense of holding the prisoner in
jail
until his case comes to us, and then all the expensive paraphernalia of
a grand
jury is required to thresh over only one side of what has already been
thoroughly heard before a trained and competent jurist. If we vote a
true bill
a third expensive trial is necessitated.”
Welfare
While
Burroughs didn’t comment directly on the issue of government-sponsored
welfare,
as a self-made man who created self-made characters, he undoubtedly
opposed the
concept. All of his heroes took care of themselves, neither expecting
nor
getting assistance from government agencies. The passage below from Jungle Tales of Tarzan states the
theory
of self-responsibility, which Burroughs certainly believed.
“Back into
the jungle he went until
chance, agility, strength, and cunning backed by his marvelous powers
of
perception, gave him an easy meal. If Tarzan felt that the world owed
him a
living he also realized that it was for him to collect it, nor was
there ever a
better collector than this son of an English lord.”
In
his fiction Edgar Rice Burroughs often enjoyed taking a sarcastic jab
at some
person or institution. In Pirate Blood,
the object was the American welfare system. “I had not shaved for two
weeks,”
Johnny Lafitte admitted. “Only a welfare worker might have found me
interesting.”
War Powers
The
various city-states in the land of the ant men were continuously at war
with
each other. According to Prince Gefasto in Veltopismakus, a wise
government
understands that war is good for its people.
“We must
have war. As we have found
that there is no enduring happiness in peace or virtue, let us have a
little
war and a little sin. A pudding that is all of one ingredient is
nauseating—it
must be seasoned, it must be spiced, and before we can enjoy the eating
of it
to the fullest we must be forced to strive for it. War and work, the
two most
distasteful things in the world, are, nevertheless, the most essential
to the
happiness and the existence of a people. Peace reduces the necessity
for labor,
and induces slothfulness. War compels labor, that her ravages may be
effaced.
Peace turns us into fat worms. War makes men of us.”
In
The Moon Men, Julian 8th
blamed weak-minded world governments for allowing the moon men to
conquer the
Earth.
“It was due
to the rise of a
religious cult which preached against all forms of scientific progress
and
which by political pressure was able to mold and influence several
successive
weak administrations of a notoriously weak party that had had its
origin nearly
a century before in a group of peace-at-all-price men.
“It was
they who advocated the
total disarmament of the world, which would have meant disbanding the
International Peace Fleet forces, the scrapping of all arms and
ammunition, and
the destruction of the few munitions plants operated by the governments
of the
United States and Great Britain, who now jointly ruled the world. It
was
England’s king who saved us from the full disaster of this mad policy,
though
the weaklings of this country aided and abetted by the weaklings of
Great
Britain succeeded in cutting the peace fleet in two … reducing the
number of
munitions factories and in scrapping half the armament of the world.”
In
The Master Mind of Mars, Prince Mu
Tel of Toonol argued that war was necessary to control overcrowding,
not only
on Mars, but also on Earth.
“War never
brought peace—it but
brings more and greater wars. War is Nature’s natural state—it is folly
to
combat it. Peace should be considered only as a time for preparation
for the
principal business of man’s existence. Were it not for constant warring
of one
form of life upon another, and even upon itself, the planets would be
so
overrun with life that it would smother itself out.”
At
times, though, Burroughs included anti-war sentiments in his stories.
In The Lad and the Lion, Burroughs
stated,
“[Some people] prefer hoes in their
hands to bayonets in their bellies.
Some
people are like that, and it is always a matter of embarrassment to
their
rulers.” Then, in Savage Pellucidar,
he observed, “Perhaps the world
would have been a better, kinder place
to live
for all the other animals who do not constantly make war upon one
another as do
men.”
At
the end of Apache Devil, Burroughs
paused to condemn the United States for a war of extinction against a
native
people of North America.
“Geronimo
had surrendered! For the
first time in three hundred years the white invaders of Apache-land
slept in
peace. All of the renegades were prisoners of war in Florida. Right, at
last,
had prevailed. Once more a Christian nation had exterminated a
primitive people
who had dared defend their homeland against a greedy and ruthless
invader.”
Religion
In
his fiction, Burroughs had no problem with some of his characters,
including
Tarzan, having a personal relationship with God. He was openly cynical,
though,
about organized religions, especially when they were sanctioned and
supported
by the state. Consider the following statement about religion in Savage Pellucidar.
“Remember,
they were just simple
people of the Bronze Age. They had not yet reached that stage of
civilization
where they might send children on holy crusades to die by thousands;
they were
not far enough advanced to torture unbelievers with rack and red hot
irons, or
burn heretics at the stake; so they believed this folderol that more
civilized
people would have spurned with laughter while killing all Jews.”
Of
course, the First Amendment in the Constitution guarantees (supposedly)
that
the government will not mettle in the religious beliefs of citizens.
However,
that has never stopped organized religions from trying to use the
government to
force their beliefs on others through government sanction. Already
previously
noted, the following passage from The
Moon Maid deserves mention again here. It shows how religious
infiltration
in the government can have dire and unexpected results.
“For some
reason no further
attempts were made to reach Mars, with whom we had been in radio
communication
for years. Possibly it was due to the rise of a religious cult which
preached
against all forms of scientific progress and which by political
pressure was
able to mold and influence several successive weak administrations of a
notoriously weak party that had had its origin nearly a century before
in a
group of peace-at-all-price men.”
Law Making
Burroughs’
occasionally turned his cynical tongue on society’s lawmakers. In Tarzan At the Earth’s Core, Tarzan
and
Jana waited for their Clovi captors to decide their fate.
“They knew
that outside upon the
ledge the warriors were sitting in a great circle and that there would
be much
talking and boasting and argument before any decision was reached, most
of it
unnecessary, for that has been the way with men who make laws from time
immemorial, a great advantage, however, lying with our modern lawmakers
in that
they know more words than the first ape-men.”
In
Tarzan and the Leopard Men,
Burroughs
took another jab at legislators. In reference to a meeting of the
Leopard Men
chiefs council, the author noted,
“There was a great deal of oratory,
most of
which was inapropos; but that is ever the way of men in conferences.
Black or
white they like to hear their own voices.”
Burroughs
used humor to discredit American lawmakers in Tarzan’s
Quest. At the end of the story, the American pilot Brown
first considered selling the Kavuru youth pills brought back from
Africa to
make a fortune. “The more I think of
it, though, the less I like my
scheme,” he
concluded. “Most everybody lives too long anyway for the good of the
world—most
of ’em ought to have died young. Suppose Congress got hold of ’em?—just
think
of that! Not on your life.”
In
Tarzan and “The Foreign Legion”,
Captain Jerry Lucas had a plan for making sure the Congress in
Washington
wouldn’t get the country involved in future wars.
“War is
rotten. If we ever get
home, I’ll bet we’ll do something about the damned Nips and krauts
that’ll keep
’em from starting wars for a heck of a long time. There’ll be ten or
twelve
millions of us who are good and fed up on war. We’re going to elect an
artillery captain friend of mine governor of Oklahoma and then send him
to the
senate. He hates war. I don’t know a soldier who doesn’t, and if all
America
will send enough soldiers to Congress we’ll get some place.”
There
was one law in particular that ERB certainly had no qualms about
violating,
along with many other Americans. The Volstead Act, codified as the 18th
Amendment to the Constitution, enforced alcohol prohibition in the U.S.
from
1920-1933. The law was a major plot element in Burroughs’ The
Girl From Hollywood.
“Like many
another, (Guy Evans)
considered the Volstead Act the work of an organized and meddlesome
minority,
rather than the real will of the people. There was, in his opinion, no
immorality in circumventing the Eighteenth Amendment whenever and
wherever
possible.”
1st
Amendment
Freedom
from federal government interference with citizens’ rights of religion,
speech,
assembly, and petition are protected by the 1st Amendment to
the
Constitution. However, none of these rights are absolute. For instance,
telling
U.S. government secrets to a foreign enemy agent is not protected as
free
speech, and the right of people to assemble in groups can be prohibit
during an
epidemic. Tarzan was obviously a great proponent of personal freedom,
but even
he knew there were governmental limitations to freedom. He admitted so
in Tarzan the Magnificent during
a
conversation with American Stanley Wood and the Kaji Queen Gonfala.
“You’ve
(Gonfala) been through a
lot, but I can promise you that when we get to civilization you’ll be
able to
understand for the first time in your life what perfect peace and
security
mean.”
“Yes,” said
Tarzan, “the perfect
peace and security of automobile accidents, railroad wrecks, aeroplane
crashes,
robbers, kidnapers, war, and pestilence.”
“I think,” said Gonfala, “that … you make one
almost afraid of life. But after all it is not so much peace and
security that
I want as freedom … Perhaps you can imagine then how much I want
freedom, no
matter how many dangers I have to take along with it. It seems the most
wonderful thing in the world.”
“Well, love
has its points, too,”
suggested Wood.
“Yes,”
agreed Gonfala, “but not
without freedom.”
“You’re
going to have them both,”
Wood promised.
“With
limitations, you’ll find,
Gonfala,” warned Tarzan with a smile. (283)
2nd
Amendment
“The
inevitable occurred. Orthis
seized London and Washington simultaneously. His well armed forces met
with
practically no resistance. There could be no resistance for there was
nothing
wherewith to resist. It was a criminal offense to possess firearms.
Even edged
weapons with blades over six inches long were barred by law.”
National Defense
Proponents
of unlimited personal freedom are apt to believe that the national
government’s
only purpose should be to protect the nation from outside attack.
Burroughs’
made an interesting statement about national defense, interesting
because it
was prompted by the actions of a great ape tribe in Jungle
Tales of Tarzan.
“Months of
immunity from danger
under the protecting watchfulness of the sentries, which Tarzan had
taught the
tribe to post, had lulled them all into a sense of peaceful security
based on
that fallacy which has wrecked many enlightened communities in the past
and
will continue to wreck others in the future—that because they have not
been
attacked they never will be.”
The Economy
Capitalism
is the econoic system the United States government has always
promoted, to
varying degrees. The means of production are mostly privately owned,
and
citizens are generally free to earn whatever amount of money their
skills and
ingenuity dictate. In Marcia of the
Doorstep, Della Maxwell revealed the advantages of capitalism,
while
criticizing the basic tenet of communism.
“It’s the
old story. Maybe it
sounds good to some; but a world in which all were equal, especially
financially, would be about as dull and impossible as the orthodox
Christian
conception of Heaven. Furthermore, no one would have enough money to
buy anything
with that anyone would want to have. It would be a drab, mediocre world
of
Forders.”
On
the other hand, In Tarzan the Invincible,
Zora Drinov described how completely unfettered capitalism could be
dangerous
to the United States.
“The
bankers, and manufacturers,
and engineers of America, who are selling their own country and the
world to us
in the hope of adding more gold to their already bursting coffers. One
of their
most pious and lauded citizens is building great factories for us in
Russia,
where we may turn out tractors and tanks; their manufacturers are vying
with
one another to furnish us with engines for countless thousands of
airplanes;
their engineers are selling us their brains and their skill to build a
great
modern manufacturing city, in which ammunitions and engines of war may
be
produced. These are the traitors, these are the men who are hastening
the day
when Moscow shall dictate the policies of a world.”
Organized
labor is another economic factor that has loomed large in American
politics
going all the way back to the birth of the nation. The right to strike
and
other contrary concerns of labor and business have continued to
challenge
lawmakers to the present day. In The Moon
Men, two neighboring men argue about which American class—labor
or
business—was responsible for the moon men’s conquest of the earth in
the year
2050.
“It’s your
own fault, Jim,” said
father. He was always blaming our troubles on Jim, for Jim’s people had
been
American workmen before the Great War—mechanics and skilled artisans in
various
trades. “Your people never took a stand against the invaders. They
flirted with
the new theory of brotherhood of the Kalkars brought with them from the
moon.
They listened to the emissaries of the malcontents and, afterward, when
Kalkars
sent their disciples among us they ‘first endured, then pitied, then
embraced.’
They had the numbers and power to combat successfully the wave of
insanity that
started with the lunar catastrophe and overran the world—they could
have kept
it out of America; but they didn’t—instead they listened to false
prophets and
placed their great strength in the hands of the corrupt leaders.”
“And how
about your class?”
countered Jim, “too rich and lazy and indifferent even to vote. They
tried to
grind us down while they waxed fat off of our labor.”
“The
ancient sophistry!” snapped
father. “There was never a more prosperous or independent class of
human beings
in the world than the American laboring man of the twentieth century.”
Colonialism
Not
much of a political issue these days, colonialism was a major
government
concern all through Edgar Rice Burroughs’ adult life in the first half
of 20th
century. European nations controlling sections of Africa occasionally
crept
into the plots of the author’s Tarzan stories, including the Belgians
in the
Congo (Tarzan and the Jewels of Opar)
and the Germans and the British in East Africa (Tarzan the
Untamed). Most colonized countries earned or were
granted their independence in the decade following World War II.
Indonesia was
one of the first, declaring its independence from Dutch colonial rule
on August
17, 1945.
When
Burroughs wrote Tarzan and “The Foreign
Legion” in 1944, the island of Sumatra, where most of
the story’s
action
takes place, was still a Dutch possession. In the story, Burroughs
allowed Tak
van der Bos, a Dutch settler on Sumatra, to give a stirring defense of
colonialism.
“Under us
Dutch, the Indonesians
have known the first freedom from slavery, the first peace, the first
prosperity that they have ever known. Give them independence after the
Japs are
thrown out and in another generation they’ll be back where we found
them.”
“Haven’t all peoples a right to independence?”
asked Bubonovitch.
“Only those people who have won the right to
independence deserve it,” said van der Bos … “If, with all that
background of
ancient culture plus the nearly two thousand years before the Dutch
completed
the conquest of the islands, the people were still held in slavery by
tyrant
rulers; then they do not deserve what you call independence. Under the
Dutch
they have every liberty. What more can they ask?”
Referring
back to ERB’s statement at the beginning of this survey, the author
committed
to imparting, “a definite impression of fictionalizing” when using the
subject
of politics in his fiction. As noted several times through this survey,
however, Burroughs had his characters so convincingly state their
thoughts
about politics and government that the reader is tempted to conclude
that the
views expressed must certainly mirror what the author himself believed.
Whether
it was or not will never be known. What is certain, though, is that
just
getting the reader to ask such questions is a testament to Edgar Rice
Burroughs’ literary talent.
ALAN'S MANY
ERBzine APPEARANCES
www.erbzine.com/hanson
BILL HILLMAN
Visit our thousands of other sites at:
BILL and SUE-ON HILLMAN ECLECTIC STUDIO
ERB Text, ERB Images and Tarzan® John Carter® Priness of Mars® are ©Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc.- All Rights Reserved.
All Original Work ©1996-2025 by Bill Hillman and/or Contributing Authors/Owners
No part of this web site may be reproduced without permission from the respective owners